Living with: Nokia 5800 camera review
By Mike Browne on January 30,
 2009 at 00:00,

The Nokia 5800 camera isn’t about chasing the pixel count, after all it’s a 3.2-megapixel snapper that’s common on a good number of Nokia’s smartphones.

As part of our LIVING WITH: Nokia 5800 camera review we’ve spent the last few days focussing on the camera, seeing if it lives up to expectations and whether the addition of a touchscreen makes it easy or more complicated to use.

If you missed our Living with: Nokia 5800 review we'd suggest you start there, as it's a great way to get to know the device in hand.

There is no denying the smart move of using a Carl Zeiss lens, after all, it’s not the number of pixels that makes for a great image, it’s the overall quality of the components used, such as the lens and the quality of the CCD that really matter.

What strikes you first is the interface, as it’s incredibly easy to get to grips with. You hit the hardware button and you’re straight into the main viewfinder. There are four function buttons, along with an Exit button, on the right-hand side and a small camera icon on the left that allows you to start up a touchscreen zoom mode. You can also use the hardware Volume buttons for this too, located on the side of the Nokia 5800.

Working through the option buttons is easy and makes taking and saving shots quick. You can take images using either the hardware button or the touchscreen. The 5800 makes the most of its touchscreen functions and while you may find the zoom slider a little trickier to use at first, after a short while it’s quicker than using the hardware buttons.

Once you’ve snapped your pics, the View/Delete options are really simple, due to the buttons being placed at the top and bottom of the screen. This means you won’t accidentally delete any shots you may otherwise wished to have kept, which is something we’ve all done, we’re sure.

What we liked most about the camera on the Nokia 5800 is how quick it was to switch modes. This is because it’s all handled in software. Simply push a button and the Modes option comes up. How easy is that?

OK, so we’re pretty impressed with the UI but what about the image quality? We’ve pitched it against our usual camera, the 12-megapixel Pentax Optio A40 and we have to say we were impressed with the colour balance and actual depth of colour on offer.

We’ve put a couple of shots side-by-side together and you can really see the contrast between the two. This shows that you don’t need the big pixel number to get results you need. Nokia has clearly made the right decision by opting for a quality lens and the CCD seems to be pretty robust too.

We’re really happy with the camera Nokia 5800, as it’s easy to use, gives great results and while it’s not as top-end as some people were hoping, it certainly delivers for the price point.

Pentax 12MP test shotNokia 5800 camera test shotNokia 5800 runs video tooNokia 5800 camera has a great viewfinderNokia 5800 cameraNokia 5800 mode selection made easy
  • denom

    Lol you should be more realistic about this phone and dont describe every con it has like “it certainly delivers for the price point” .

  • Mikey Bee

    It’s too easy just to dismiss the camera as not being good enough because there are higher MP camera phones out there. As we pointed out, we’ve been liviing with the 5800 for a few weeks now and were truly impressed with the quality on offer.

  • http://www.senseapplied.com Farhan

    Would love to know more about about the build quality of the phone , planning to get one on it\\\’s launch in Pakistan

  • Saad

    i got this mobile a few days back and i must say i really like the innovative idea behind the touch screen ..im impressed by this mobile, its easy to use and fuctions are easy to catchup, another good thing is that the UI is almost the same as previous nokia mobiles which makes it easy for usual nokia users to get used to the touchscreen

    having said that however, im not quite happy with the picture quality. my dad has got N73 which again is 3.2MP like the nokia 5800 and i think the picture quality of N73 is far better compared to 5800..in low light this mobile fails to produce good results and those small dots are visible that make the image blurry but in light it can come up with a reasonable picture. the video results are again not so impressive.

    overall i would consider it a great mobile..its got a quite a reasonable price but if u are chasing a mobile with a good camera like i do, this might not be your choice…i had to decide between nokia n95 and this and i opted for this because of its touchscreen and lighter weight…so i would give it a 7/10.

  • manas

    read!!

  • jesse

    I read (living with nokia 5800) before buying one. Thanks for the great review.

    As a warning for anyone else who might buy this device, skip it. In terms of the camera, with the exception of the nice geo-tagging feature (which is one of the main reasons I purchased this phone) there are no other good features, and a number of problems.

    Nokia Xpress Music Camera Notes

    1] The camera on my phone (now 4 weeks old) currently does not work. I expect it is some software error. The battery died a few days ago so the phone powered off without going through its own shutdown procedure. This caused a lot of programs to not work anymore, one of them is the camera.

    2] The flash LED lights can not be turned off.
    You can turn the flash “off” but the lights will still turn on very brightly (a good percentage of full power) before you take a pic, no matter what. Perhaps this is to allow autofocus to get a good bright image. Well the result is bad – it wastes a lot of battery power. The autofocus, should it need a light, could have used infrared.

    Anytime you want to take a portrait the subject will be temporary blinded (how rude). This is in some cases dangerous (if you don’t know that the flash is going to flash – you have already disabled it), consider taking a picture of a car at night, the driver could be blinded by the flash.

    3] Autofocus will not focus on subjects closer than about 10 centimeters. So if you want to take a pic of a business card or a printed page (which i need to to all the time) you will get poor results. This is not because of hardware – it focuses inside 10 cm, but the software cant catch it, and then the autofocus fails.

    4] The camera chip (probably a CMOS, it does not have the image quality of a CCD) has Huge amounts of dark current, picture quality about equal to the MP4 video camera I bought for 10USD in Beijing.

    Lots of dark current means that the chip is garbage, or that the hardware design is garbage, or that it was not fixed in software (which should not be done anyway because you will be adulterating the real pic data). What I mean by dark current, is the amount of noise (current in the chip) that should not be there. The result is that black is not black, rather it looks like JPEG compression turned up to 80%, or a fuzzy analogy TV picture (for those of you who remember analogue TV). Anyway, not acceptable when Nokia has been able in the past to put together really good camera hardware. But what did they do this time? outsource? Really my Nokia from 5 years ago takes great pictures, i would rather use that phone than this new one. I upload a lot of pics taken outside, and i must take pics and upload from the old phone (6670?) now just because the quality of new one is too poor.

    As a consumer, you should understand that the company can pay less than 1 USD (I can get reasonable CMOS imagers for a few RMB in Shenzhen) for their CMOS image chips. They can put a good chip in your phone, or a garbage chip in, saving a few cents. So they will put in a garbage chip, which costs a dollar less. Consumers don’t know the difference, Company saves a million dollars when making a million phones, but you get a garbage camera.

    5] The hardware “snap a pic” button is way way better than the N96.

    6] Geotagging of images is automatic (once you activate it) and has no problems other than the amazingly slow to start up GPS. I often have to wait 15 minutes for it to start up. Forget trying to geotag near any buildings, GPS antenna is too weak.

    7] There is light leak in the camera. Images are often washed out (depending on scene composition) from the flash light leaking into the camera.

  • marc sanders

    Well, I was talked into getting this camera by a Vodafone rep. saying the camera was comparable the the LG Renoir – OMG blatant lie. The camera is near on always completely out of focus and grainy as hell when used with the flash. Daytime phots aren’t too bad for a 3.2mp camera but night time phots are a waste of effort and time. If you are looking specifically for a camera phone – look elsewhere, there are better phones for cheaper prices. For a multi function phone, the 5800 isn’t bad all round. The slide lock is probably the best feature for a touch screen phone I have seen so far!

  • comnut

    well I ask, do you want the latest **touch screen** phone or not???? and if you are stupid enough to **believe** a salesman, well…….

    if not, get a standard one, and get used to the long-winded way of operating those…

    If you do, you have very few choices….

    spend a lot more money on the latest new releases, ( N97, etc..) and not that much more stuff for the money…. (they will be half that price in about a year…)

    get an iphone, and find out lots of stuff they totally missed out, but never mind, you can afford it, and it looks pretty….
    http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=2826&idPhone2=2537

    I am staying with the nokia syntax I know… If you are having migration problems, the 5800 ‘file transfer’ will send a helper app. to your old phone!! :)

    or do you want the challenge of moving **all** your stuff to a totally different system????

  • Bruce McClean

    My 5800 camera with a flash gives very poor fotoes

  • chandy

    Pics in my 5800 in dull light is very sick. Its better if you change the Wh. Balance to Cloudy.

  • http://noknok ricky

    i took a photo in the dark nd i was shock at the picture quality lol but i like the phone for music but i must remember to not try to take a photo in the dark again anyone no out there why that the picture quality is bad in the dark reply plz thanks

  • Pramod

    i don\\\’t know why peoples are making bad publicity for nokia 5800 camera quality i recently bought a new one and found that 5800 has a decent camera images taken from 5800 at day light are very nice but also if we take images at night and indoors with NIGHT MODE AND FLASH AT AUTOMATIC it takes really good images at low light conditions also

  • yvette

    I got this phone 4wks ago on contract. So far ive been really happy with it. Even thought the camera was good but recently the flash just hasnt been good enough to take pictures in a fairly dark room. I thought 3.2mp was quite a good camera. I had a sony ericsson k810i & that had the same camera & it was amazing.

    Also for some reason when i take photos the phone isnt saving them & all the photos ive taken in the past have gone from my memory card :S

    Gonna take it back to the shop today & get them to sort it

  • Daz

    Hi, just wondering is there a date/time stamp on photos?
    Cheers

  • rashid

    at first, a good quality camera was all i needed, 3 mp attracted me and i purchased it without checking out its result, now a huge disappointment. picture taken in low light are pathetic.