<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia N900 Vs Google Nexus Go Head-To-Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noknok.tv/2010/01/08/nokia-n900-vs-google-nexus-go-head-to-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noknok.tv/2010/01/08/nokia-n900-vs-google-nexus-go-head-to-head/</link>
	<description>Tap into everything Nokia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan L.</title>
		<link>http://www.noknok.tv/2010/01/08/nokia-n900-vs-google-nexus-go-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-16704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noknok.tv/?p=9723#comment-16704</guid>
		<description>&quot;With a slightly more established operating system, the Google Nexus One offers more applications for download, but it’s only a matter of time before the Nokia N900 catches up, especially once Nokia starts rolling out other Maemo devices.&quot;

What?! How is that going to happen? Android has 1) more devices, 2) more manufacturers, 3) more users, 4) a bigger patron company and 5) by virtually all accounts is growing exponentially. I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s out of the realm of all possibility, but considering the context and the market, it seems incredibly unlikely that Maemo overtakes Android in number of apps available. In order to catch up, they would not only have to match Android&#039;s enormous growth rate but also exceed that growth rate, which seems to me to be an incredible, nay, impossible, task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With a slightly more established operating system, the Google Nexus One offers more applications for download, but it’s only a matter of time before the Nokia N900 catches up, especially once Nokia starts rolling out other Maemo devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>What?! How is that going to happen? Android has 1) more devices, 2) more manufacturers, 3) more users, 4) a bigger patron company and 5) by virtually all accounts is growing exponentially. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s out of the realm of all possibility, but considering the context and the market, it seems incredibly unlikely that Maemo overtakes Android in number of apps available. In order to catch up, they would not only have to match Android&#8217;s enormous growth rate but also exceed that growth rate, which seems to me to be an incredible, nay, impossible, task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank</title>
		<link>http://www.noknok.tv/2010/01/08/nokia-n900-vs-google-nexus-go-head-to-head/comment-page-1/#comment-16682</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noknok.tv/?p=9723#comment-16682</guid>
		<description>The worst comparison of these phones ever!!

The only thing discussed is their looks and what OS they use. No mention of their specs, RAM, processor, onboard applications etc etc!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst comparison of these phones ever!!</p>
<p>The only thing discussed is their looks and what OS they use. No mention of their specs, RAM, processor, onboard applications etc etc!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/14 queries in 0.041 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.noknok.tv.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.noknok.tv @ 2012-02-10 11:16:29 -->
