The Nokia N900 is one of our favourite smartphones, offering exceptional power and features to go with its innovative Maemo 5 operating system. It can’t stand still, however, with a range of excellent Android-based handsets and the Apple iPhone 4G on their way, so what next for the Nokia N900? We take a look at the features the Nokia N900’s successor will need if it’s to prove successful…
We’re big fans of the Nokia N900, but there are lots of areas where changes could be made if it’s to fall in line with rivals. It’s arguable whether some of these features will actually make its successor a better smartphone, however, so we’ve taken a look at what could be included in the next Nokia N900, and whether the changes will make it a better device.
Capacitive or resistive touchscreen technology?
If the Nokia N900 has come in for criticism, one of the recurring themes centres on the resistive display. With resistive panels, extra pressure has to be added in order to get a reaction to your inputs and, with multi-touch technology, capacitive panels are currently in vogue. This doesn’t mean they’re better, however.
With so many ‘experts’ calling for capacitive technology in the next Nokia N900, it’s worth thinking about what you’ll lose if Nokia does make the switch. For a start, capacitive panels aren’t as accurate, and you’ll need to use the largest part of your finger to get a response. They may not currently be as popular, but there’s also no denying the appeal of being able to use your touchscreen device while wearing gloves, or with a stylus.
Nokia has also shown with the current Nokia N900, and with devices such as the Nokia N97 Mini, that resistive technology can be brilliantly responsive. For us, the only downside is the lack of multi-touch support, but if this could somehow be implemented it could be a perfect solution. We’d like to know what you think, however, so leave a comment below and let us know: Capacitive or resistive?
Touchscreen or QWERTY keyboard?
One of the factors stopping the Nokia N900 from achieving the same sort of success as some of its rivals is the bulky form factor, in part necessitated by the inclusion of a full QWERTY keyboard.
So, is it worth dropping the QWERTY keyboard? This would allow the Nokia N900’s successor to be at least half the thickness, certainly allowing it to slip into pockets a lot easier than the current model. This would naturally impact on usability, although with one of the larger touchscreen panels on the market, the Nokia N900 also offers a better platform on which to base an onscreen keyboard.
As it stands, we’d prefer to put up with the extra bulk, as the keyboard is truly excellent and it makes a great device for writing emails. Again, we’d like to know what you think, however: Is it worth dropping the keyboard altogether in favour of a much smaller form factor, or do you think this is one of the factors that makes the current Nokia N900 so good to use.
Maemo 5, Maemo 6 or MeeGo?
The announcement of MeeGo – a combination of Maemo and Moblin – at Mobile World Congress took us by surprise, especially considering how good an operating system Maemo 5 on the Nokia N900 is. There’s always room for improvement, however, and with Intel also on board MeeGo definitely has a lot of potential. Whether the Nokia N900’s successor will be the first device to switch to MeeGo remains to be seen, however, as it could also use an updated version of the current Maemo 5 operating system.
It wouldn’t be a disaster either way, as the current OS has proved itself time and time again as a wonderfully fluid and versatile choice, and one of the reasons the Nokia N900 has gained so much support. What would you prefer to see though? An evolution of the current software, or a switch to MeeGo?
AMOLED technology
Nearly all of the rival products we’ve seen launched this year have featured AMOLED technology for the screen, and it seems almost inevitable that Nokia will follow suit with the next Nokia N900.
Providing better, brighter and more vivid colours, an AMOLED screen could transform the Nokia N900. It’s also a more power efficient technology, and on a device with a big screen like the Nokia N900, this could make a big difference to battery life.
Ovi Maps with turn-by-turn navigation
One of the biggest disappointments so far this year is the fact that the Nokia N900 currently lacks support for Ovi Maps 3.03, with its free turn-by-turn navigation. Ovi Maps 3.03 has proved incredibly successful, and judging by the amount of feedback we’ve received the successor to the Nokia N900 must include support for the latest versions of Ovi Maps.
With its big screen and landscape orientation, the Nokia N900 is the perfect smartphone to double as a sat-nav device, so it really is a shame that we haven’t seen support for Ovi Maps 3.03 as yet. Offering support for the Nokia N900’s successor will definitely prove popular, however, and help to beat off rivals.
Is there anything else you’d like to see in the Nokia N900’s successor? We’d like to hear your ideas, so leave a comment and let us know.