The Future For Nokia: Touchscreens or Buttons?
By Phil Barker on July 26,
 2010 at 00:00,

Touchscreen-or-proper-buttonsWith nearly all the major smartphone manufacturers switching to touchscreen devices, we were happy to see some feedback the other day pointing out just how useful smartphones with physical buttons – such as the Nokia E72 – actually are. Join us after the break to find out more…

The vast majority of Nokia’s handsets still feature physical buttons, and although it seems fashionable for the latest handsets to feature large touchscreen displays, some of us still prefer the more traditional method of entering text and data.

It seems that some of the guys at Nokia Conversations agree, with the site pointing out that while touchscreen devices look shiny and minimalist, and pictures look much better on the larger displays, there definitely are some downsides.

Nokia C6: The perfect compromise?

The biggest issues with touchscreen handsets are the fact that it’s a lot more difficult typing with one hand, or even typing at a similar speed to QWERTY smartphones such as the Nokia E72 or Nokia N97 Mini.

It’s a topic that splits opinion, however, with the readers of Nokia Conversations taking both sides. A particularly interesting statement from reader Nitish Kumar points out that “technically our fingers can’t judge that they are on right places or not with a touch screen like flat surface without looking at the screen”.

As always, there’s a counter argument, with reader Ddd pointing out: “I hate keyboards that make phones bulky”. For some of us, devices like the Nokia N97 Mini or Nokia C6 strike the perfect balance – offering both a large touchscreen and a proper hardware keypad, but the extra bulk won’t suit all users.

We’d like to know what you think, however. Do you prefer touchscreen handsets, smartphones with proper buttons, or a device with both big screens and sliding keypads? Leave a comment below and let us know.

Via Nokia Conversations

  • Rayan

    I really wished a touch screen with a navigation key and a call and disconnect physical button.( since u need a physical proof when making or disconnecting a call)
    I still prefer the physical normal keypad, something like the E75 but what really solves it all is the E90 design -despite its huge size- which Nokia worries us from not updating such a successful device concept)

  • Andrew

    I prefer to have a physical keyboard on a phone which I’m using as an ultra-portable computer. The main uses for my N900 (besides phone calls) are internet browsing and email. Typing is just sooo much easier when using both thumbs on a landscape physical keyboard. As for crtl+c and ctrl+v, etc, I love my keyboard shortcuts. I’m really hoping that the purported N8-01 (with a lower spec camera and real keyboard) gets launched at the same time as the N8. This is the phone I’ll be buying my wife to replace her 5800. She just doesn’t get on with touchscreens for typing.

    As for the future, I hope that we see both touchscreen only and keyboard combo phones continue. I feel toucscreens are a bit ‘faddy’ right now because of the emperor’s new iPhone effect, but over time consumers will begin to see the benefits of real keyboards in their phones, especially as they become more capable/powerful and start being used as real computers instead of simple iApp-shifting devices.

    I predict an iPhone with a real QWERTY keyboard at some point in the future. It will be both revolutionary and magical, and Apple will have ‘invented’ it.

  • Phil B

    I’m the same Andrew, but with my N97 Mini. The OS isn’t quite so slick but the handset is just that little bit smaller than the N900, makes it easier to pocket.

    It’s so much easier than typing on a touchscreen device – it’s infuriating having something incorrectly second guess what you’re trying to type!

  • StanJ

    I own a Nokia Express 5800 with a third party visual interface giving it a great practical and eye candy effect. (SPB Mobile shell). My wife owns a flip style Nokia with large buttons. She’s happy with using it as a phone or just SMS, so it’s a plain vanilla, so to speak.
    I ‘m happy to use the touch screen. I can configure the size of the buttons and can use a stylus, my finger or any other handy item to write,dial or navigate. My wife prefers the larger buttons.

    The main difference in choice however is ease of use and visibility. All phone users aren’t young with good eyesight. As one gets older and long sightedness becomes a problem (You’ve seen people holding the phone away at arm length to read a message.) size of buttons becomes a real issue.
    The smaller the phone the smaller the buttons. To me a larger screen with it filled with customisable fonts and buttons will probably be a buying point for users who find they need to wear glasses.

    One of the good advantages of Nokia over Apple is variety of choice.